| SUMMARY | ||||
|
No 9, 6.12.2000. Digest
(By Radenko Udovičić) On 02 and 03
December a round table on minority rights in Bosnia and Herzegovina, FR
Yugoslavia and Croatia was held in Neum. It was another one in a series
of expert seminars organised by Sarajevo Minority Rights Centre, Dalmatian
Solidarity Committee from Split and Local Democracy Agency from Subotica.
The very sites where organisers are originally based suggest that the project
is regional in nature which strives for improvement of minority rights
through experience exchange and recommendation of remedies as minority
rights in these three countries, which share a number of common denominators,
are not at an impressive level.
(By Mladen Obrenović) If anyone thinks
that the "new minorities" who arose in Croatia following the breakup of
former Yugoslavia have the biggest problems, the Croatian Germans and Austrians,
who received the status of "minority" only after 1990, will be quick to
undeceive them, asserting that their burden is in no way lighter. On the
contrary, they stress that despite the fact that a systematic framework
exists for the defence and development minority rights, their status in
practice depends more on the will of individuals than on strict enforcement
of established national policies.
(By Branko Galić) Advisor for
National Minority Education in the Republic of Croatia under the Ministry
of Education and Sport Jadranka Huljiev speaks about the law passed six
months ago regarding the upbringing and education of national minorities.
She stresses that finances pose the biggest obstacle to the law's application.
The segregation of Roma children in Croatian schools is a difficult topic
for her, but she recognizes that the separation exists as a result of these
children's weak educational foundation, their unsatisfactory knowledge
of the language, and poor working habits.
(By Miroljub Radojković) In the spirit of European principles, it is a duty of public broadcasters to translate the state's obligation into practice by ensuring that programming as well as dissemination and access to information are available to minorities in their respective native languages. State cannot exempt itself from this obligation irrespective of whether any other broadcasters owned by members of minority or broadcasters broadcasiting a certain share of programmes in minority languages emerge. |